aworks’s posterous

"Have You Seen . . . ?": A Personal Introduction to 1,000 Films


Louise Brooks Society at LiveJournal   Louise Brooks Society at LiveJournal
Louise Brooks Society at LiveJournal - LiveJournal.com

"Have You Seen . . . ?": A Personal Introduction to 1,000 Films

Another new book which references Louise Brooks is David Thomson's "Have You Seen . . . ?": A Personal Introduction to 1,000 Films. In this just published work, the internationally acclaimed British-born film writer (whose many books include the classic Biographical Dictionary of Film) offers cinephiles and film novices alike a comprehensive yet personal list of 1,000 must-see films. One of the films Thomson writes about (each film gets a page) is Brooks' sensational 1929 silent film, Pandora's Box.

Thomson's inclusion of Pandora's Box is no surprise. As any reader of this blog knows, Thomson has written a handful of articles about the actress over the years. And she is referenced in other of his journalism and books. Its evident the film writer has an appreciation for the film star. In his new book, Thomson declares Pandora's Box Berlin premiere in February, 1929 to be one of the"turning points in cinema."

I have been acquainted with David Thomson for many years. And I will be hosting him for an author event on December 4 at 7:30 at the Booksmith in San Francisco. David will be discussing his new book, showing a few brief film clips, and signing books. I would like to encourage anyone interested in film to attend. David is a fascinating speaker (I have hosted him on a number of occasions) and he truly loves movies.



Some more information, from his publisher, about David Thomson's new book:  "In 1975, David Thomson published his Biographical Dictionary of Film, and few film books have enjoyed better press or such steady sales. Now, thirty-three years later, we have the companion volume, a second book of more than 1,000 pages in one voice — that of our most provocative contemporary film critic and historian.

Juxtaposing the fanciful and the fabulous, the old favorites and the forgotten, this sweeping collection presents the films that Thomson offers in response to the question he gets asked most often — “What should I see?” This new book is a generous history of film and an enticing critical appraisal written with as much humor and passion as historical knowledge. Not content to choose his own top films (though they are here), Thomson has created a list that will surprise and delight you — and send you to your best movie rental service.

But he also probes the question: after one hundred years of film, which ones are the best, and why? “Have You Seen . . . ?” suggests a true canon of cinema and one that’s almost completely accessible now, thanks to DVDs. This book is a must for anyone who loves the silver screen: the perfect confection to dip into at any point for a taste of controversy, little-known facts, and ideas about what to see. This is a volume you’ll want to return to again and again, like a dear but argumentative friend in the dark at the movies."

Comments

Comments [0]

Stop the Circular Firing Squad


The Next Right

Stop the Circular Firing Squad

By Patrick Ruffini on John McCain

Folks, listen to Mark McKinnon on this one: There is nothing to be gained by second-guessing the McCain strategy at this point. In ten days, we'll get to have a discussion about where we go next -- about Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal, Mitt Romney, Mike Huckabee, or Eric Cantor. We'll have to elect a new RNC Chairman who gets to figure out how we rubuild the edifice from scratch and wage the first $1 billion campaign in 2012. We're going to have new people at the NRCC and NRSC who are going to have to come to terms with the fact that there are no safe seats anywhere, and that we need to do 72 Hour and have real campaigns in every district. That will be much more important than looking into the rearview mirror on the probably unwinnable race for the White House. 

Like McKinnon I too feel the McCain camp could probably have done some things differently, but it probably wouldn't be enough to save them. What is striking about 2008 is how little the campaigns have mattered in comparison to the fundamental nature of the two men running.

Nothing the McCain campaign did could change the reality of McCain the candidate's poor management instincts and his tendency to fidget around and not stay on message. When the economic crisis hit, this reality flew in the face of the McCain campaign's message of steadiness versus inexperience. Whether by design or the candidate's nature, Obama's caution and deliberation was a living, breathing talking point against the experience card.

Likewise, I think it will be said that the McCain campaign has yet to really lay a glove on Obama character-wise because Obama himself simply does not project the cloying, insecure, effete tendencies of past nominees like Gore and Kerry, though the only two times he's come close (Wright and bitter/cling) have barely figured in the general election campaign. I do think "celeb" was the best chance we had to define Obama personally, but again, though there is something to be said for attacking a guy's strength, Obama's grassroots appeal was a legitimate strength, not a hidden weakness.

I am becoming more and more convinced that to run for President, you need to be the kind of person who doesn't give a s*** what's said about you and you just keep on going, steady as she goes. Obama has this, and so did Bush in both his campaigns. The key is to appear calm, unruffled, and grounded in your persona while seeming to be a man (or crucially, woman) of action in politics and policy. 

So, number one, the race was very, very tough because of the political environment, and it became hellish after the economic crisis.

And two, the race was very, very tough because of the particulars of the Obama-McCain matchup. I happen to think Romney/Palin would have been a stronger ticket, but I'm not sure it could have won either.

Comments

Comments [0]

`Pure Contraption'

ideax


Anecdotal Evidence
A blog about the intersection of books and life.

`Pure Contraption'

By Patrick Kurp

On the morning Nige wrote about his devotion to Bach, Gram Parsons and Schubert, I listened in my car to Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau singing Die Winterreise. An hour earlier I had suggested to a friend that he listen to the Mills Brothers. I love Schubert but I was using him, in part, prophylactically: I wanted to get “Glow Worm” out of my head. I’ve written about Schubert before, here and here, but Nige speaks for me when he writes:

“Unlike the cleverclogs who write the liner notes, I have little technical knowledge of music, so my responses are almost entirely emotional (very emotional -- music moves me to tears far more easily than any other art form).”

When music hits me – and often it doesn’t -- it’s unmediated, pre-rational and pre-critical, not at all the way I read King Lear or look at a Matisse. Music is to poetry and painting as the sense of smell is to the sense of sight. I’m musically ignorant enough to believe that music is about something, often something quite emotional. When listening to good jazz Larkin said he was reduced to “a grinning, jigging wordlessness, interspersed with a grunt or two at specially good bits.” Music inspires inarticulation. I’m at my least coherent listening to Casals playing Bach’s cello suites, The Band’s second album, middle-period Bill Evans, Dylan singing “I’ll Keep It with Mine” or Satie’s “Gymnopédies.”

This December 70 years ago Auden wrote “The Composer” (the same month he wrote “Musée des Beaux Arts,” “The Novelist,” “Rimbaud” and “A.E. Housman,” among other beauties):

“All the others translate: the painter sketches
A visible world to love or reject;
Rummaging into his living, the poet fetches
The images out that hurt and connect.

“From Life to Art by painstaking adaption
Relying on us to cover the rift;
Only your notes are pure contraption,
Only your song is an absolute gift.

“Pour out your presence, O delight, cascading
The falls of the knee and the weirs of the spine,
Our climate of silence and doubt invading;

“You, alone, alone, O imaginary song,
Are unable to say an existence is wrong,
And pour out your forgiveness like a wine.”

In his sonnet, Auden emphasizes the directness of music at the other end of the process -- for the composer, not the listener: “Only your notes are pure contraption.” Nothing seems more transcendentally difficult, nearly impossible, than musical composition and performance. For mere listeners, music is among the chief privileges of being human. As a college freshman, my roommate (the son of Austrian and Slovak immigrants) introduced me to Dvořák, Smetana and Janáček, and I introduced him to Miles Davis and An American in Paris. Once, with Gershwin on the stereo, Mike said: “I wish I could just listen to music for the rest of my life.” For now, listen to Lorenzo in The Merchant of Venice:

“The man that hath no music in himself,
Nor is not mov’d with concord of sweet sounds,
Is fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils;
The motions of his spirit are dull as night,
And his affections dark as Erebus:
Let no such man be trusted. Mark the music.”


Comments [0]

Links for 2008-10-18 [del.icio.us]


The Standing Room
Singing and Parking in San Francisco

Links for 2008-10-18 [del.icio.us]


Comments [0]

From Wasilla to New York


The Standing Room
Singing and Parking in San Francisco

From Wasilla to New York

By M. C—

Different trains, on the Bridge to Nowhere.

h/t DecSimp (someone NEEDS to perform this)


Comments [0]

Nica's Dream


The Greenleaf Music Blog
Independent thoughts for independent musicians.

Nica's Dream

Barry Singer in the Sunday Times profiles the Baroness Pannonica de Koenigswarter, on the release of a book of her photographs.


IF the mysterious Baroness Pannonica de Koenigswarter is at all remembered today, it is for her proximity to the deaths of two legendary jazz musicians. In 1955 Charlie Parker died on a sofa in her Fifth Avenue home; 27 years later Thelonious Monk died after secluding himself for years in her New Jersey house...

Her illustrious family has long refused to discuss her. But now a new book, "Three Wishes: An Intimate Look at Jazz Greats" (Abrams Image), offers a window into her personal life, providing details even her jazz intimates were probably unaware of.

The book is primarily a collection of candid photographs of the musicians taken by the baroness, and a compilation of their varied responses to a favorite question: "What are your three wishes?" On Oct. 30 an exhibition of her original notebooks collecting these snapshots and wish lists will open at the Gallery at Hermès in New York.


Comments [0]

Effortless Action


Mark Forster's Blog
Get Everything Done: All About Time Management and Personal Organisation

Effortless Action

By Mark Forster on Time Management

Something I have often mentioned on this blog is that when I am totally on top of something then I have energy to do that something. This applies even if it’s something I don’t particularly like doing.

A classic case of this is doing the dishes. If I allow the dishes to mount up for a week, then the energy to finally do them is going to be conspicuously lacking. What’s more, the very thought of them is going to be draining my energy for other work. If on the other hand I tackle them immediately after each meal, then the energy is there and I can put them out of my mind until the next meal.

Like me, you may have many “trouble spots” which you find difficult to keep organised. For some people it’s keeping a tidy desk. For others it may be things like filing or dealing with email. And for a lot of us it’s all of them!

There’s a two-step process which will keep you on top of tasks like these:

1. Increase the frequency at which you deal with the task.

2. Work all out to get on top of the task (it may take several sessions to get there)

3. Once you are on top, aim to stay there by completing all the task each time.

So let’s take as an example the task of keeping a tidy desk (one very dear to my heart!). In theory I tidy my desk once a day, but in practice it often gets missed out because I’m too tired at the end of the day. A vicious circle then develops because the more effort it’s going to take to tidy the desk, the less likely I am to summon up the effort to get the task done.

So looking at the three-step process, what can I do to solve this? The first step is to increase the frequency at which I tidy the desk. So I could have a rule that I tidy my desk every hour on the hour. Each hour I put away everything on my desk, except the stuff I am currently working on. Since not much is going to have built up in an hour, this tidying will usually only take me a few seconds. Problem solved!

Challenge

Pick some minor annoyance in your life like an untidy desk, and carry out the three-step process. Once you’ve solved that problem, ask yourself what else you can use the method on.


Comments [0]

Best of one world


Seth's Blog
Seth Godin's riffs on marketing, respect, and the ways ideas spread.

Best of one world

By Seth Godin

As always, the truth lies in the cliches.

"Having the best of both worlds" is something that marketers shoot for all the time. They want the traffic that a community site will give them, but they also want the control they get by only having authorized employees participating. They shoot for their favorite parts, and get nothing. Always nothing.

Instead, perhaps it's worth hoping for the best of one world.

Compromise, by its nature, means giving up part of one thing to get part of something else. So you end up with a little of this and a little of that. The low fat of prunes and the shelf appeal of a cupcake. Sounds good on paper, but when given the choice, the diet conscious will pick a real prune and the gluttons will pick a real cupcake. And you're left with an overstock situation.

When in doubt, maximize.


Comments [0]

Dust Your Keys with a Keyboard Brush [Stuff We Like]


Lifehacker   Lifehacker
Computers make us more productive. Yeah, right. Lifehacker recommends the software downloads and web sites that actually save time. Don't live to geek; geek to live.

Dust Your Keys with a Keyboard Brush [Stuff We Like]

By Gina Trapani on Keyboards

When a can of compressed air is overkill for getting that light layer of dust and crumbs off your keyboard, you might just want a keyboard brush. You can pick up one of these soft brushes with long fibers that get between your keys without pressing them for about five bucks at an office supplies store. I scored one as a freebie at an event, and it's the perfect thing for someone who's anal about a dusty keyboard—especially a black keyboard that shows off all the dust particles living on it—but doesn't want to bust out the compressed air once a week. If your keyboard needs a more thorough cleaning than a quick brush-off, consider a pipe cleaner or Q-Tip to get into the crevices.



Comments [0]

Landmarks (36)


Renewable Music
A displaced Californian composer writes about music made for the long while & the world around that music. "...giving it the test of time." — Ruggles "...'alive in the present." — Varèse "Menschen wie wir sollten nie Concessionen machen!" — Mahler, letter to Strauss 1894 "My God, what has sound got to do with music!" — Ives

Landmarks (36)

By Daniel Wolf

Virgil Thomson: Sonata da Chiesa (1926) for Eb clarinet, trumpet in D, viola, horn, trombone.

This is one of the strangest pieces written in a decade delightfully full of strange pieces.  Thomson himself considered this to be his "master-piece," in the historical sense of a work written by a journeyman to demonstrate technical command of a craft, and in this case, the dissonant style of the era. (It's composition coincided with the composer's final studies with Nadia Boulanger, and the Sonata da Chiesa must be counted with Copland's Organ Symphony,  as among the strongest works to come out of that famous boulangerie).  

The strange mastery at work here is most apparent in the instrumentation.  The ensemble inverts the usual balance of more strings to fewer winds, and more woodwind than brass in favor of more brass, a single high clarinet and a single string instrument, and that one, the viola, which is least heard soloistically.  There is a deliberate choice of instruments with uneasily-matched tonal preferences, with the eb clarinet and the d trumpet more or less dividing sharp and flat keys between one another.  Thomson uses ensemble scoring patterns in which none of the instruments is used strictly or consistantly as a high, middle, or low voice, thus the little eb clarinet in chalumeau register can function as the bass and the trombone as a superior alto voice.

Strangest of all is the question of genre.  Thomson identifies the piece, by its title, with an Italian baroque form,  not the secular sonata, but a multi-movement form intended for use in the Catholic church.  But this Sonata, with three movements taking the forms of a Chorale, a Tango, and a technically extravagant Fugue (in which material from the chorale returns with a menace), while ornately baroque on its own terms, is American, more specifically African-American, and churched in an African-American protestant tradition, narrating — if we can trust John Cage on this point — a remembered visit to a Kansas City church service, complete with sermon and congregational response, centered about the Tango's direct confrontation with the diabolical, and with the polytonal fugue suggestion some form of redemption after temptation.  It is easy, too easy, at this historical distance, to be uncomfortable with Thomson's racial views, which were liberal but still of their time, and to take this work as a somewhat illicit form of appropriation, but I increasingly hear this piece as an honest act of appreciation and, in his mixture of modernity and elements exotic to both Thomson's white Kansan and European musical roots, something much more than a journeyman's diploma piece.   


Comments [0]